Did you know that if you wrap a rubber band around your testicles, you might experience massive erections? Don't wrap it too tight or it can cause pain after a while and lead to more serious complications. I don't believe it's true nor am I willing to try it to find out. But it gave me a better idea. How about condoms with a tight film sphincter to apply a strong grip at the base of the penis?
http://www.thinkaloo.com
Showing posts with label tight. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tight. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Monday, July 27, 2009
shy girls mini skirts
usually tight minis are for girls who want to show their nice legs. if the mini is very mini you are justified to think they could want to show more. i am thinking of their new panties they 'forgot' to wear on a men-happy i'm slutty day. what i'm about to describe is the fun you can have with the shy type of girls who become self-conscious about the mini after they hit the streets with it. you'll see them walking and adjusting the mini down with both their hands. if they sense a man is walking behind, they get more anxious and obvious in adjusting the skirt which will make you fix your stare at them even more.
what self-conscious girls don't realize of course is that there is nothing they can do to adjust the skirt that will make any difference in terms of how they appear to the man behind who's getting a perve up the maker's mark.
even if they stick a small pin to their stockings or a gum inside the thighs to help pin the skirt to a fixed level of perve, self-conscious girls would still be seen handjusting the mini in a futile attempt to batten down the hatches. it's obvious the problem is not with the size of the mini but with the size of an obsessed female brain!
the moment of dread comes when stairs appear, all of a sudden. it's like gandalf magic. blow the whistle and a white horse or flying eagle appears. unfortunately there's no magic for her. the plain truth is she's been preoccupied fixing the skirt setting her vision to the ground long enough to miss the elephant ahead.
a self-conscious girl will then make an awkward and immediate stop to pick up the phone and pretend she's talking to her girlfriend. essentially she's checking to see if anyone is behind before she makes an attempt to mordor up the stairs.
if you're following from behind, the best thing you can do at that moment is to let something yours drop on the floor and kneel down to pick it up. shy for shyster. as you make your move to stand up keep looking into her legs and apologize for the unruly behavior of your pen which keeps dropping off your pants whenever you go up the stairs.
the self-conscious girl will probably muster all her energy to try to not show how uncomfortable or embarrassed she is. if she had her way, she would be rushing to a changing room to put some pants on.
to drive her to the edge of embarrassment and into the path of no return, don't let her wait for you to get out of her sight by just going up the stairs. act surprised and say "oh this pen's not mine, it must be yours, here" and give it to her with a shy and unpretentious smile.
the mini will find its way to oxfam the following day and the self-conscious mini girl switch to maxo for the rest of her life! if she has nice legs though, be a gentleman and don't do any of that, let her stay mini (each i pronounced eye for an eye respectively) and save your pen too :)
http://www.thinkaloo.com
what self-conscious girls don't realize of course is that there is nothing they can do to adjust the skirt that will make any difference in terms of how they appear to the man behind who's getting a perve up the maker's mark.
even if they stick a small pin to their stockings or a gum inside the thighs to help pin the skirt to a fixed level of perve, self-conscious girls would still be seen handjusting the mini in a futile attempt to batten down the hatches. it's obvious the problem is not with the size of the mini but with the size of an obsessed female brain!
the moment of dread comes when stairs appear, all of a sudden. it's like gandalf magic. blow the whistle and a white horse or flying eagle appears. unfortunately there's no magic for her. the plain truth is she's been preoccupied fixing the skirt setting her vision to the ground long enough to miss the elephant ahead.
a self-conscious girl will then make an awkward and immediate stop to pick up the phone and pretend she's talking to her girlfriend. essentially she's checking to see if anyone is behind before she makes an attempt to mordor up the stairs.
if you're following from behind, the best thing you can do at that moment is to let something yours drop on the floor and kneel down to pick it up. shy for shyster. as you make your move to stand up keep looking into her legs and apologize for the unruly behavior of your pen which keeps dropping off your pants whenever you go up the stairs.
the self-conscious girl will probably muster all her energy to try to not show how uncomfortable or embarrassed she is. if she had her way, she would be rushing to a changing room to put some pants on.
to drive her to the edge of embarrassment and into the path of no return, don't let her wait for you to get out of her sight by just going up the stairs. act surprised and say "oh this pen's not mine, it must be yours, here" and give it to her with a shy and unpretentious smile.
the mini will find its way to oxfam the following day and the self-conscious mini girl switch to maxo for the rest of her life! if she has nice legs though, be a gentleman and don't do any of that, let her stay mini (each i pronounced eye for an eye respectively) and save your pen too :)
http://www.thinkaloo.com
Thursday, May 21, 2009
Special glasses for laptop use in plane
Some airlines (Delta, United, Virgin etc) are rushing to offer Wi-Fi internet connections in economy. Most people cite cramped space on the tray table as the major problem for laptop use in a flight but I think privacy is a more serious problem. Text chatting with my girlfriend or friends, I wouldn't want the guys sitting next to me reading what I write. We are all curious creatures by nature and easily tempted to read into everything that gets displayed on someone else's computer screen.
One way to solve the privacy issue is with special use glasses that the passenger puts on to watch what is displayed on the computer screen which stays turned off. I looked up online and found out that head mounted display glasses already exist. They connect to common video sources and are ideal for mobile entertainment and information applications.
I expect that as in-flight Wi-Fi becomes available and people take their laptops with them, there will be a big demand for use of such glasses to protect privacy. I think it's a smart investment to buy stocks of companies that make them.
http://thinkaloo.com
One way to solve the privacy issue is with special use glasses that the passenger puts on to watch what is displayed on the computer screen which stays turned off. I looked up online and found out that head mounted display glasses already exist. They connect to common video sources and are ideal for mobile entertainment and information applications.
I expect that as in-flight Wi-Fi becomes available and people take their laptops with them, there will be a big demand for use of such glasses to protect privacy. I think it's a smart investment to buy stocks of companies that make them.
http://thinkaloo.com
Sunday, April 12, 2009
A (pervert) gadget ring
I just thought of a ring that can be custom-made to contract and tighten in your finger in the same rhythm, timing and intensity as your lover's vagina muscles do. Assuming it's possible to store in memory and replicate vaginal undulations and create the ring, what do you think of it? Is it too pervert a gadget? Will it sell only as a prank-ring? Can it enhance sex drives if worn regularly? In a prank store it can sell under the name 'The Lord of the Rings'. In Tiffanny's it can take a more descriptive name, e.g. 'Tightania' with the word tight alluding to how the mechanism of the ring works :)
http://www.thinkaloo.com
http://www.thinkaloo.com
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
Why do we need superdelegates in an election?
This thought was posted on Thinkaloo on 18 February 2008 by member liz
Visit www.thinkaloo.com, our new online community where you can share your thoughts and knowledge, discuss your ideas, ask questions and meet smart people
------------------------
A democratic election is one based on people's votes. I don't understand why people who were not elected have power and authority to decide on an election outcome. I think we should remove super-delegates and electorates in US party and national elections. They complicate the vote and make the systems less democratic and transparent.
When Gore lost to Bush back in 2000 not on the basis of the majority of the national vote which he had won but on the basis of more electorates in Florida, that was a setback to the credibility of US democracy. We were criticized for that by people abroad.
I am worried that the tight race between Obama and Hillary might result to a similar situation. What do you think? Shouldn't we simply move away from this system, wouldn't it be an improvement to our democracy to get rid of delegates and electorates all together?
Visit www.thinkaloo.com, our new online community where you can share your thoughts and knowledge, discuss your ideas, ask questions and meet smart people
------------------------
A democratic election is one based on people's votes. I don't understand why people who were not elected have power and authority to decide on an election outcome. I think we should remove super-delegates and electorates in US party and national elections. They complicate the vote and make the systems less democratic and transparent.
When Gore lost to Bush back in 2000 not on the basis of the majority of the national vote which he had won but on the basis of more electorates in Florida, that was a setback to the credibility of US democracy. We were criticized for that by people abroad.
I am worried that the tight race between Obama and Hillary might result to a similar situation. What do you think? Shouldn't we simply move away from this system, wouldn't it be an improvement to our democracy to get rid of delegates and electorates all together?
Labels:
delegates,
democracy,
election,
electorate,
hillary,
majority,
obama,
politics,
race,
superdelegates,
system,
tight,
US election,
vote
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
